Have managed to revise my paper for the conference I'd like to go to.

As I don't think I've mentioned this before, bit of a catch-up: the project to create a website for students 'offered a place but not yet here' contains a Library section I've had a big hand in designing. I wrote up the rationale, method, design and so on as a journal article and then started looking for places to have it published. The Second Life gang I work with were also doing the same for Second Life things. I noticed a conference in eastern europe that might fit the bill for both subjects.

My paper came back from the reviewers with two comments: 'no scientific merit and no technical mead' (whatever that is) 'but a good description of the project'. Thank you. I'd quite agree. It's an IEEE sponsored technical conference and I was surprised they were even considering it but I was willing to see what I could do about it.

There wasn't *much* I could do to change it but I did change one of the diagrams into something that looked much more like a wiring diagram than a screen shot, the lady who actually does the Flash building (and who I've now added as co-author) gave me a couple of sentences on the technical behind the scenes stuff and I added a couple of references and tweaked another sentence. So, there's nothing more I can do. We'll see.