Let the head settle in and then talked to him about the blog.

Fully expected to be pulling the entry *despite* the bright idea my assistant had had which suggested adding to the blog entry with some interesting URLs that counterbalanced the main entry in an 'informationy' sort of way. Which I did.

But to my surprise, and all credit to the head: he was keener to avoid 'censorship' than to immediately pull the entry. Though he did decide to meet with some of the principle parties which won't be for a few days - so things may change again then.

In the meantime, he came up with his own very sensible suggestion. I'd been using first person (as I do here) and would probably have continued doing on that blog. Only he pointed out that it just wasn't clear who the 'I' was and if we were going to own the thing - even if I take responsibility for much of its content - then it should feel more like the library speaking. Easily fixed through the edit function.

Of course, I hope I'm *not* the sole source of content. I'm hoping others join in as well.